Archive for June, 2010

What Makes a Good Project Manager?

June 22nd, 2010

The key to achieving success on an IT project rests in the hand of the project manager. The debate then focuses on whether you have a good project manager on a bad project or a bad project manager on a good project. Jim Vaughan, a frequent contributor to CIO.com, wrote an article recently revealing some of the essential characteristics an IT project manager needs to possess in order to be effective.

1)      A project manager needs to clearly communicate the vision and objectives of the project to his/her team members. A good way to test your communication effectiveness is by spot checking your team. Consistency in their answers as well as a good understanding usually means you’ve done a good job communicating.

2)      Next, the relationship between project manager and team is extremely important. Typically, the team will follow a person they trust and feel comfortable working around. So, to a degree, the project manager needs to be liked as to not be ignored. Look at the team’s interaction with the manager. Are they unified in their goals or is there a power struggle taking place?

3)      The final key is motivation. A project manager must inspire if the team is going to succeed. A positive mental attitude and a projection of supreme confidence can go a long way. Your team is going to mimic your attitude, so make sure it is a good one.

You can read Mr. Vaughan’s article, “How to Tell if You Have a Good Project Manager,” over on CIO.com. IMF’s July Forum will be focusing on Project Management and Outsourcing. If you’re interested in learning more, you can view the Forum details and register on the IMF website.

Building a Privacy, Security, and Compliance Framework

June 18th, 2010

Protecting the privacy of employee and customer data has become increasingly more difficult for corporations.   LexisNexis has taken an industry leadership position in terms of ensuring data privacy. A few members of the LexisNexis team took time yesterday to share some of the company’s best practices on building its Security, Privacy, and Compliance Framework on an IMF Web Forum.   A few key points from the presentation are included below.

 

Why are privacy, security, and compliance important?  LexisNexis believes they are important for a number of reasons, including information security breaches that are a global, industry-wide problem. In addition, implementing a strong privacy, information security, and compliance framework into an organization will positively impact the brand, market share, risk mitigation, customers, and employees.

 

LexisNexis has made security part of its business model.  They encourage organizations to put a framework in writing, make it clear, and always adhere to its guidelines. 

 

Here are some things to consider when putting a framework in place: 1) complete an inventory of information assets with personally identifiable information; 2) evaluate data security, credentialing, and all policies, standards, and guidelines; 3) most importantly factor in audit and compliance.  Additionally, make sure your framework is process driven with a quarterly application inventory, risk assessments, and audit programs (both internal and third party). 

 

LexisNexis also addressed the steps to ensure data security.  Some examples included: updating inventory on a regular basis; codifying the collection, use, and dissemination of PII/SPII in policies; restricting/limiting third party access; encrypting all sensitive data both in transit and at rest; and taking advantage of password assessments.

 

Last but certainly not, LexisNexis places an emphasis on educating and training its employees on the guidelines, use, and privacy of sensitive data.  There is annual mandatory training for employees. Taking it one step further, regular privacy, security, and compliance-related communications are distributed via the intranet and email, among other methods.

Be Careful Where You Outsource

June 16th, 2010

Later this week, the Black Book of Outsourcing will release its annual rankings of the most dangerous outsourcing spots in the world. Stephanie Overby talks about the list in her article over on CIO.com called “Offshoring: The 25 Most Dangerous Cities for Outsourcing in 2010.”

Based on an annual survey of offshore outsourcing location risk, 3,100 corporate development leaders, including more than 400 outsourcing customers, were asked to indicate their company’s inclination to consider specific offshore locations for outsourcing (including IT outsourcing and BPO). The survey also asked respondents to rank those cities on various perceived threats and weaknesses, including geopolitical risk, terrorist threats, climate concerns, legal maturity, environmental waste and pollution, IT and telecom infrastructure security, and crime rates.

Top 5 Riskiest Cities for Offshore Outsourcing in 2010:

1. Karachi, Pakistan

2. Medellin, Colombia

3. Juarez, Mexico

4. Cali, Columbia

5. Tijuana, Mexico

On a more positive note…

Top 5 Safest Cities for Offshore Outsourcing in 2010:

1. Prague, Czech Republic

2. Warsaw, Poland

3. Brno, Czech Republic

4. Krakow, Poland

5. Toronto, Canada

Check out Stephanie’s article to view the full lists over on CIO.com

For more information on IT outsourcing, members can attend the IMF Outsourcing and Project Management Forum next month in Atlanta by registering HERE. You can also view the Forum Agenda, including presentations and speakers HERE.