Archive for the ‘IT Outsourcing’ category

Remote Workforce Transition

October 14th, 2011

Connects are a valuable service The IMF provides for its members. When they have an issue they come to us and we arrange a web conference with other members who are in the same boat or can provide valuable insight into that particular situation. In one of our recent connects, an IMF member company was in the early stages of transitioning to a remote workforce and looking for help. They were looking to move some of their home office employees to remote status. A report is now available for that Connect discussion and below is a brief outtake from it which talks about changing your mindset in terms of managing remote workers:

We have done a lot of outsourcing and I’ll define outsourcing as utilizing a low cost alternative to in-house staff. That could mean taking on off-shore, near-shore, and U.S. third party partners. This also includes converting employees into a temp status while working remotely. The one thing we learned, sort of the hard way, is that it was easy to set up and define how to manage a third party resource. We tried to manage or maintain a relationship with the remote work-from-home type of employees as if they were simply working in another office of ours. However, this approach did not become effective for us or reduce any of the frustrations associated with that type of relationship until we actually looked at them as if they were a remote third party resource. That may sound a little confusing but what I mean is when we went to third party partners, instead of managing the people, we managed the process. We figured out what the process was and what was important for us in that process. Focus on what part made it an effective resource, what part ensured quality, and what particular metric(s) defined success. These tended to vary on each process. You had to spend a lot of time working with the business to identify what metrics they could look at that would actually say this was running well and define future improvement…”

Members can download the full report HERE. In that report you will read about how different companies determine potential benefits to their customers and define the success of their remote workforce. Learn about working with the business side to determine proper metrics and the benefits of using third party resources to handle your work-from-home employees. Some of the other issues approached in the report include training your leadership and using a “manage the process, not the people” method for your remote workers.

Benchmarks for StaaS

October 7th, 2011

A consistent focus area for IMF benchmarking clients over the past year or so has been more robust implementations of utility models for storage. We’ve all seen the charts in meetings showing exponential growth of storage footprints year over year, and seen storage become a bigger and bigger piece of the IT cost pie. Caleb Masland, who heads The IMF’s benchmarking practice, recently gave a presentation to members on benchmarks for storage as a service (StaaS). Below is a snippet from that report involving some observations on storage technologies:

Backup infrastructure is being virtualized quickly. This is the space where you can reach a lot of “low hanging fruit” because the environment tends to have a lower transaction volume. Therefore, you have some ability to take dedicated backup islands and consolidate them. Most physical and off-site media is disappearing. Physical tape in general is decreasing drastically and really only used for compliance purposes. There are more specific backup management policies that are being developed. Note that companies are not backing up everything because that is the easiest policy to make. They realize now there needs to be a correlation between data availability for business reasons and for compliance reasons. Somewhere in the middle is the right balance to strike as it relates to your data backup policies.

Storage resource management and storage footprint reporting are becoming critical skillsets. A lot of organizations have historically had a problem with footprint reporting in terms of storage installed on the floor that is allocated to business units, applications, or being utilized. As you move toward a StaaS model, companies need to take a step back and make improvements in their capacity management and planning. One trend The IMF sees is companies having more mature and robust capacity planning organizations and teams that are being centralized. More importantly, those groups are earning a seat at the table for major decisions about infrastructure upgrades and even project portfolio management…”

IMF members can download the full report here.

Nervous Excitement in the Cloud

June 24th, 2011

While cloud computing is still in its infancy stages, the consensus at this point is many companies will eventually head in that direction. Lower costs, scalability, and agility are just a few of the traits that make the cloud an attractive option. However, despite the innovation potential, many IT employees are worried about losing their jobs. Part of the lower costs mentioned above are the results of less overhead, which means a reduced IT staff. Everybody in the country is well aware of our economic situation. This isn’t exactly the best time to be cutting jobs in any industry, let alone IT. That being said, the larger these cloud providers become the more help they will need in running their operations. In a sense, a company moving their apps to the cloud is kind of like outsourcing. Any job losses wouldn’t likely happen overnight but as this is seen as more of a long term prognostication. For those who survive the possible onslaught, they may see their job descriptions and skill sets drastically change. There are others of course who are not too concerned. After all, the cloud is ultimately IT and it is going to take IT people to run it. At the same time, while it seems to be the proverbial talk of the town now, many believe the cloud won’t dominate quite as much as projected. Time will tell but as an IT employee what are your thoughts? Are you fearful or inspired with the prospects of cloud computing?

Here is a great article from RedmondMag.com that talks about the good, bad, and in-between of the cloud and its effect on IT jobs: The Cloud vs. IT- is your job in jeopardy?

For more on cloud computing, join our Connect discussion on July 6th: Public Cloud Computing