Archive for the ‘News’ category

Get Ready for Some Disruption Smartphones, Here Comes Google Glass

March 29th, 2013

Disruptive Technology Innovation Google Glass

So just when Blackberry rolls out a new phone to catch up to the industry it dominated only a few years ago, the smartphone gets the first glimpse of what could make it obsolete, maybe. Google Glass is out in a beta form and Google calls their testers “Glass Explorers”. Click here to view a Google Glass demo video entitled “Project Glass: One Day…”

Naysayers will say that it won’t catch on, it’s dangerous, they will step in front of buses and crash into cars, they will never wear these, etc. They may be right. However, I remember an experience on an Avis bus when I had my first cellphone. A couple of guys on the bus began griping about how they would never get a cell phone and travel time was their only sanctuary. Judging from the stats I see, these guys either relented or died.

So will Glass replace smart phones or simply redefine the form and style, perhaps giving the Bluetooth wearer yet another fashion option?

 

Send in the (Cyber) Troops

March 21st, 2013

cyberwarfareThe cyber battlefront is heating up…

While there’s been no official declaration of war, the Cyberwar is well underway. So much so that NATO even recently released a manual establishing the “rules” of cyber warfare. There are fingers being pointed in every direction. The U.S. blames, China. China blames the U.S. North Korea just allegedly attacked South Korea. Everybody is involved even if there’s a dispute around who started it. I’m glad the U.S. is beginning to take a more aggressive approach considering some say we’re already losing the battle.

I read article after article saying we are simply not prepared for a cyber-war. Whether it’s the media sensationalizing or not, President Obama’s got his work cut out for him. Cyber threats aren’t your typical threats. It’s not one country invading another with bombs and tanks. These kinds of attacks happen in the shadows, out of sight and out of mind. Fear of the unknown can be the worst fear of all. Cyber-attacks present opportunities never even considered before so obviously we haven’t prepared for all possible outcomes. We don’t know what we don’t know.

Based on reports, China continues to steal intellectual property from American businesses at an alarming rate. Today it seems like there are two kinds of companies: 1) companies who’ve been hacked and know it and 2) companies who’ve been hacked and don’t know it. From the largest corporations to the smallest mom and pop stores, everyone’s a target. It’s gotten to the point where the U.S. publically called out China to stop commercial cyber-espionage and theft of trade secrets. Naturally China denies the attacks, claiming the U.S. has unjustly portrayed them as the villain. These attacks will continue and I’m not sure we can really do anything to stop them.

One solution could be sending our own cyber troops into battle per se. According to Defense Department officials, the Pentagon’s Cyber Command will deploy more than 100 cyber teams within the next three years. These teams will be divided into three forces. Cyber-Protection forces will defend the military networks. Combat Mission and National Mission forces will focus more on offensive operations. Without getting into a “government overstepping its bounds” argument, I can’t help but wonder if these “cyber troops” will be called on to aid the private sector as well. Shine the bat signal or something, we need help. I don’t care how good a company’s IT Security organization is, they’re no match for a nation-state and their resources.

Additional Reading

The Art of Cyberwar (Slate)

China hacking claims: tech firms move to front line in US cyberwar (The Guardian UK)

Hack Attack: China and the U.S. Trade Barbs on Cyberwarfare (Time)

Rising cyber-nationalism leads to amplified cyber-mistrust (TechWorld)

US in Cyberwar Arms Race with China, Russia (NBC News)

 

Mayer, Yahoo! Taking a Step Back in Hopes of Moving Forward

February 26th, 2013

It seems as though Yahoo! CEO Marissa Mayer has caused a bit of a firestorm today with her initiative aimed at bringing all employees in-house. The reason: more collaboration to foster innovation. To say this decision has been second guessed and severely criticized would be quite an understatement. It seems like everyone is jumping on Mayer, even Sir Richard Branson.

While the move seems a bit antiquated, especially for a tech company competing with the likes of Google and Microsoft, I think she made the right call. Granted, it’s a risky call and one I’m sure she didn’t want to make but that’s a CEO’s job. She has to make the tough, unpopular decisions for the greater good of the company and I admire her courage and conviction.

Looking at this on the surface, it’s clear why people are upset. In an age where telecommuting has become a more practical and acceptable option, how can you take that away from your employees? Going a step further, when competing for top talent, remote work capabilities and emphasizing work-life balance is often a highly sought after perk. So it’s clear this may damage Yahoo!’s ability to attract and retain top level talent.

However, there’s much more at play here than meets the eye in my opinion. There are a number of studies showing that working from home improves productivity to a certain extent. Unfortunately, not everybody who works from home is in fact more productive. As with many things, everybody wants to make very broad and general statements when in reality each case is different. Mayer has been at Yahoo! long enough now to have a feel for the company’s culture. Obviously she felt something was wrong in terms of their remote workforce and some ex-Yahoo! employees tend to agree with that assessment.

I view her approach as a form of tough love. A privilege has been abused so she’s taking it away for the time being. I don’t think this ban on working from home will last forever but she’s making a point. Yahoo! wants to improve their standing and they need innovative ideas. It’s time for their employees to come together, literally now in the same physical office, and get to work. There’s going to be casualties but sometimes you have to take a step back in order to move forward.

What do you think of Mayer’s controversial move to pull the plug on remote workers? Will it have a substantial negative impact on Yahoo! as most people think or was it necessary to get the company back on track?